smilingblue

Recent Questions

  • @ Vincent Cable
    Business Secretary

    The Centre for Welfare Reform has shown comprehensively that 25% of the cuts fall on the 3% of the population who are most severely disabled. £9bn of the total £89bn deficit cutting programme affects ... Show more »The Centre for Welfare Reform has shown comprehensively that 25% of the cuts fall on the 3% of the population who are most severely disabled. £9bn of the total £89bn deficit cutting programme affects disabled people directly. The work capacity assessment is draconian and inappropriate for many people with severe or fluctuating conditions. You must be seeing many people in your surgeries who are on the breadline and who have lost or are terrified of losing the vital support they need to survive at the most basic level. Without proper but already insufficient, support, the weakest are often unable to leave their homes, pay basic living costs or in some cases wash or eat. For example, it has been reported that there are only 18 local councils left out of around 100 that provide social care for people with 'moderate' needs, who are defined as those needing assistance with bathing and eating. What is happening to people in other areas? The withdrawal of benefits has already lead to at least one known suicide as emotionally depicted at this week's demonstration at the ATOS head office in London. Proposed deep cuts to disability living allowance and the time limiting of Employment Support Allowance to only 12 months for people who had no way of knowing in advance of becoming ill, that the goalposts would change, will also have a huge negative impact on people who are already experiencing financial hardship and are struggling to cope with the basics of life. Even in your own borough of Richmond upon Thames, where disability living allowance is given by the Government with one hand, it is taken by the Council with the other hand to pay for personal care. For a young sick person trying to start out in life, struggling through a university course against the odds and hoping to find a way to earn a little income, this is cripplingly restricting as it takes away money she desperately needs to live and also will charge her, pound for pound for every little bit of income she ever manages to gain to try and improve her lot in life. You seem like a kind and decent man. How can you allow your party in government to support the measures currently being put forward that target those who are desperate and in need over those who can afford to pay? Show less »

    Submitted by: smilingblue | 3 votes for this..

    0 comments | Topic: Politics | Report | Bookmark and Share

  • @ Jenny Willott
    Liberal Democrat MP for Cardiff Central

    The Centre for Welfare Reform has shown comprehensively that 25% of the cuts fall on the 3% of the population who are most severely disabled. £9bn of the total £89bn deficit cutting programme affects ... Show more »The Centre for Welfare Reform has shown comprehensively that 25% of the cuts fall on the 3% of the population who are most severely disabled. £9bn of the total £89bn deficit cutting programme affects disabled people directly "Another news story that became apparent was that the Liberal Democrats have broken yet another promise. More accurately, they voted with the Government on the Welfare Reform Bill Committee to remove the mobility component from claimants in residential care, despite a motion on opposing restrictions to mobility component at the Spring Conference. I have touched upon this story before, but had to wait for the Hansard records of the meeting to be published. As these records show, the Liberal Democrat MPs Ian Swales and Jenny Willott actually left the room when this issue was put to vote, meaning that the amendment tabled to oppose the Government's plans was defeated. Liberal Democrat members should hold their MPs to account for this further betrayal. The records also show that Jenny Willott had stooped to the level of voting against one of her own amendments, presumably in order not to upset Government whips." Please can you explain your actions in regard to the above quote from the Broken of Britain website. Thank you Show less »

    Submitted by: smilingblue | 2 votes for this..

    0 comments | Topic: Politics | Report | Bookmark and Share

Popular Questions

  • @ Vincent Cable
    Business Secretary

    The Centre for Welfare Reform has shown comprehensively that 25% of the cuts fall on the 3% of the population who are most severely disabled. £9bn of the total £89bn deficit cutting programme affects ... Show more »The Centre for Welfare Reform has shown comprehensively that 25% of the cuts fall on the 3% of the population who are most severely disabled. £9bn of the total £89bn deficit cutting programme affects disabled people directly. The work capacity assessment is draconian and inappropriate for many people with severe or fluctuating conditions. You must be seeing many people in your surgeries who are on the breadline and who have lost or are terrified of losing the vital support they need to survive at the most basic level. Without proper but already insufficient, support, the weakest are often unable to leave their homes, pay basic living costs or in some cases wash or eat. For example, it has been reported that there are only 18 local councils left out of around 100 that provide social care for people with 'moderate' needs, who are defined as those needing assistance with bathing and eating. What is happening to people in other areas? The withdrawal of benefits has already lead to at least one known suicide as emotionally depicted at this week's demonstration at the ATOS head office in London. Proposed deep cuts to disability living allowance and the time limiting of Employment Support Allowance to only 12 months for people who had no way of knowing in advance of becoming ill, that the goalposts would change, will also have a huge negative impact on people who are already experiencing financial hardship and are struggling to cope with the basics of life. Even in your own borough of Richmond upon Thames, where disability living allowance is given by the Government with one hand, it is taken by the Council with the other hand to pay for personal care. For a young sick person trying to start out in life, struggling through a university course against the odds and hoping to find a way to earn a little income, this is cripplingly restricting as it takes away money she desperately needs to live and also will charge her, pound for pound for every little bit of income she ever manages to gain to try and improve her lot in life. You seem like a kind and decent man. How can you allow your party in government to support the measures currently being put forward that target those who are desperate and in need over those who can afford to pay? Show less »

    Submitted by: smilingblue | 3 votes for this..

    0 comments | Topic: Politics | Report | Bookmark and Share

  • @ Jenny Willott
    Liberal Democrat MP for Cardiff Central

    The Centre for Welfare Reform has shown comprehensively that 25% of the cuts fall on the 3% of the population who are most severely disabled. £9bn of the total £89bn deficit cutting programme affects ... Show more »The Centre for Welfare Reform has shown comprehensively that 25% of the cuts fall on the 3% of the population who are most severely disabled. £9bn of the total £89bn deficit cutting programme affects disabled people directly "Another news story that became apparent was that the Liberal Democrats have broken yet another promise. More accurately, they voted with the Government on the Welfare Reform Bill Committee to remove the mobility component from claimants in residential care, despite a motion on opposing restrictions to mobility component at the Spring Conference. I have touched upon this story before, but had to wait for the Hansard records of the meeting to be published. As these records show, the Liberal Democrat MPs Ian Swales and Jenny Willott actually left the room when this issue was put to vote, meaning that the amendment tabled to oppose the Government's plans was defeated. Liberal Democrat members should hold their MPs to account for this further betrayal. The records also show that Jenny Willott had stooped to the level of voting against one of her own amendments, presumably in order not to upset Government whips." Please can you explain your actions in regard to the above quote from the Broken of Britain website. Thank you Show less »

    Submitted by: smilingblue | 2 votes for this..

    0 comments | Topic: Politics | Report | Bookmark and Share