Direct, open conversation with public figures - for everyone with a question to raise

OwenE2

Owen Beith
Email
(Hidden)
Birthday
(Hidden)
Joined
Oct 23 2008 7:15:07 PM
Last Visit:
Oct 26 2008 9:33:36 PM
51 Profile Score

Score Breakdown

  1. 5 points for posting 1 question
  2. 46 points for people yoosking your questions

Recent Questions

  • @ David Miliband Labour MP
    MP for South Shields

    The UK has been a notable supporter of the responsibility-to-protect principle, under which when sovereign states fail to protect their citizens from mass atrocity, through incapacity or ill will, it ... Show more »The UK has been a notable supporter of the responsibility-to-protect principle, under which when sovereign states fail to protect their citizens from mass atrocity, through incapacity or ill will, it becomes the collective responsibility of the international community to take appropriate action and sovereign immunity no longer applies.  How can responsibility to protect be seen as a genuine - binding - responsibility when behind it ultimately sits the absolute immunity that the United Nations claims for itself and its agents, as for example in the case of the failure of the United Nations and the Netherlands, through incapacity or ill will, to protect civilian refugees entrusted to their safe-keeping from genocide at Srebrenica?  How would you propose resolving this fundamental failure of accountability?
    Show less »

    Submitted by: OwenE2 | 47 votes for this..

    0 comments | Topic: World Affairs | Report | Bookmark and Share

Popular Questions

  • @ David Miliband Labour MP
    MP for South Shields

    The UK has been a notable supporter of the responsibility-to-protect principle, under which when sovereign states fail to protect their citizens from mass atrocity, through incapacity or ill will, it ... Show more »The UK has been a notable supporter of the responsibility-to-protect principle, under which when sovereign states fail to protect their citizens from mass atrocity, through incapacity or ill will, it becomes the collective responsibility of the international community to take appropriate action and sovereign immunity no longer applies.  How can responsibility to protect be seen as a genuine - binding - responsibility when behind it ultimately sits the absolute immunity that the United Nations claims for itself and its agents, as for example in the case of the failure of the United Nations and the Netherlands, through incapacity or ill will, to protect civilian refugees entrusted to their safe-keeping from genocide at Srebrenica?  How would you propose resolving this fundamental failure of accountability?
    Show less »

    Submitted by: OwenE2 | 47 votes for this..

    0 comments | Topic: World Affairs | Report | Bookmark and Share